Proposed changes to electronic catch and position reporting circulars
Have your say
Fisheries New Zealand invited feedback on proposed technical and minor changes to the following circulars:
- Fisheries (E-logbook Technical Specifications) Circular 2018
- Fisheries (E-logbook Users Instructions and Codes) Circular 2018
- Fisheries (Geospatial Position Reporting Devices) Circular 2018
The changes followed Cabinet's agreement to amend the Fisheries (Reporting) Regulations 2017 and the Fisheries (Geospatial Position Reporting) Regulations 2017.
Consultation ran from Monday 1 October 2018 to Friday 19 October 2018.
The proposed changes include:
- protecting sensitive information about precise fishing locations
- requiring fishers to provide information from licensed fish receivers in a landing report no later than 15 days after landing
- clarifying that fishers report live fish, such as rock lobster, that are placed in a holding tank on land before being taken to a licensed fish receiver
- instructions for fishers who wish to provide event reports under multiple permit holders during a trip
- allowing reporting for partial containers
- clarifying when geospatial position reporting (GPR) devices must be used by vessels and fishers.
We only sought feedback on the proposed changes that are tracked in these circulars:
- Draft Fisheries (E-logbook Technical Specifications) Circular 2018 [PDF, 1005 KB]
- Draft Fisheries (E-logbook Users Instructions and Codes) Circular 2018 [PDF, 2 MB]
- Draft Fisheries (Geospatial Position Reporting Devices) Circular 2018 [PDF, 537 KB]
Making your submission
Consultation closed at 5pm 19 October 2018.
Submissions are public information
Note, that any submission you make becomes public information. People can ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we have to make submissions available unless we have good reasons for withholding them. That is explained in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.
Tell us if you think there are grounds to withhold specific information in your submission. Reasons might include that it's commercially sensitive or it's personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold information can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may tell us to release it.
Has this been useful? Give us your feedback